Friday, April 5, 2013

Cultural Artifacts of Homelessness

Artifact #1: US Government Definition of Homelessness 


"An individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and nighttime residence." (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/11302)

Artifact #2:  National Alliance to End Homelessness definition 

"Homelessness occurs when people or households are unable to acquire and/or maintain housing they can afford."
(http://www.endhomelessness.org/pages/snapshot_of_homelessness)

Artifact #3:  CNN News clip:  A night in a Homeless Shelter


Artifact #4:  Raising Awareness of Homelessness in Austin, TX


Artifact #5:  National Coalition for the Homeless Campaign
















Artifact #6:  The Soloist


Artifact #7:  Lyrics of What’s it Like by Everlast's first verse

We've all seen a man at the liquor store beggin' for your change
The hair on his face is dirty, dread-locked, and full of mange
He asks a man for what he could spare, with shame in his eyes
"Get a job, you fucking slob," is all he replies
God forbid, you ever had to walk a mile in his shoes
'Cause then you really might know what it's like to sing the blues

Artifact #8:  Simpsons – The day violence died


Artifact #9:  The Tommy Taylor Show:  Are Homeless People Really Homeless?


Artifact #10: WTTE:  Ohio Pandhandler Uses Donations to Buy Giant Flat-Screen TV



According to the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department, the United States had 633,782 people homeless on a given night in January 2012.  In a western powerhouse where wealth and waste are ever present, homelessness continues to be a significant concern.  So what is homelessness?  And what lenses do Americans view this concern?

In searching cultural artifacts for various portrayals of homelessness and homeless individuals, I found a number of common themes, one of the most popular being homelessness as not having a home, or roof over one’s head, and utilizing government or church programs for shelter.  Both the U.S. government and various nonprofit organizations define homelessness as not having adequate housing (artifact #1 and #2).  This is portrayed through various forms of media (artifact #6 and #8) and is often connected to living in a homeless shelter (artifact #3).

Another mainstream image and artifact closely tied to homelessness is that of an elderly gentleman, disheveled, pushing a cart or holding up a sign, and who is often considered “crazy”.  This frequently is the face and representative of homelessness, as seen in artifact #4 and #5’s campaigns to raise awareness, and is also one of the main representations of homelessness in movies, TV shows, and songs (artifact #6, #7, and #8).

Another portrayal of homelessness that is often circulated is the idea that homeless individuals are panhandlers who scam those they beg from.  As seen in the GEICO spoof  (article #9) and the new's clip (article #10), there is a perception that homeless individuals are not really in need and that helping them will only make you a victim to their scams. 

Although the above portrayals of homelessness are valid (a significant portion of the homeless population do not have adequate shelter and the majority of homeless individuals are single men), these portrayals do not encompass the whole story.  Homelessness is more than just ‘rooflessness’, as asserted by Moore (2003).  Its definition is more complex than not having a home and involves issues of detachment from society, social exclusion, and a lack of belonging and other meanings tied to home, such as privacy, security, and freedom.  In addition, homelessness consists of more than just single men, the visible homeless (May et. al., 2007).   This emphasis of single men often negates the voices of homeless women, youth, children, LGBTQ, and those who live couch to couch.

It is only when we move beyond the cultural artifacts that portray homelessness as ‘rooflessness’ and as an issue tied solely to single men, are we able to address more than a single aspect of homelessness.  It is only when we stop justifying our apathy towards the homeless by labeling them as panhandlers and scammers, are we able to begin constructive conversations of this issue.   And it is only when we transpose the theories of homelessness that look beyond ‘rooflesness’, and include those who are often the invisible homeless, in both policy and practice, are we able to begin to truly address homelessness.

Campaign:  The Voices of the Invisible

As discussed above, homelessness is a complex issue that involves more than just ‘rooflessness’ and impacts various individuals with differing needs.  Yet, too often, homelessness is addressed with only the visible homeless (single men) in mind and with solutions that target only one aspect of homelessness (rooflessness).  Our campaign, The Voices of the Invisible, strives to move beyond these mainstream portrayals of homelessness, challenging individuals to redefine their definition to include those whose voices are often not heard, whose faces and experiences in homelessness are often invisible.  These include women, children, youth, and LGBTQ, to name a few.  As May et al. (2007) asserts,
“The naming of a social problem is central to the responses that follow, and all such naming strategies work to exclude and to restrict.  In seeking to identify a redistributive social policy agenda, then, it is essential not only to recognise that women too suffer the exclusions of visible homelessness, but that the experience of street homelessness is different for women.” (p. 135)

A particularly invisible group of the homeless population is that of foster children.  Although having a roof over their head, many foster children often feel homeless.  Some move from placement to placement with their belongings carried in one black garbage bag.  Others feel ostracized and excluded, labeled as children with behavioral problems and having issues at home.  Still others, no matter how many placement homes they have lived in, never find a place they call home. 

According to the CRS Report for Congress (2007), 25% of foster youth experience homelessness and “youth ‘aging out’ of the foster care system experience homelessness at a greater rate than their counterparts in the general population, due, in part to family disconnectedness” (p. 31).  In California, 65% of youth emancipating out of the foster care system do not have a place to live (http://www.childrenunitingnations.org/who-we-are/foster-care-statistics/)
 and in 2011, 104,236 foster children were waiting to be adopted (http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/waiting2011.pdf). 

When redefined to include people other than single men and issues beyond ‘rooflessness’, it is clear that the homelessness of foster children and youth is a significant concern.  Yet, despite these stark statistics, very little is done in policy and practice to address these challenges.  It is the hope of The Voices of the Invisible campaign that through campaign posters, advertisements, flyers, etc., we can raise awareness and educate people regarding this fragile population.  These campaign advertisements are meant to challenge definitions and give voice to those once silent.  In turn, we hope that this will ignite conversations and processes that acknowledge these groups in homeless policies, practices, and changes.